Toggle navigation
Manual coffee grinders
Coffee makers
Electric coffee grinders
Proctor Silex E167CYR
vs
Moccamaster KM4 TT
Home
Electric coffee grinders
E167CYR vs KM4 TT
48
Gadgets
41
Features
Electric coffee grinders
Best Electric coffee grinders
Prev
Next
Our choice
Proctor Silex E167CYR
Moccamaster KM4 TT
Check Price
Check Price
Capacity
Grinding capacity
14 ounces
Quantity of cups
10
12
Power
Wattage
185 W
Voltage
120 V
120 V
Blade
Material
stainless steel
stainless steel
Type
Bowl
Material
plastic
Capacity
Removable Bowl
YES
Comfort
Number of grind settings
Auto cleaning system
NO
NO
Auto shut-off
NO
NO
Cleaning brush included
NO
Measuring scoop included
NO
Features
Programmable
NO
NO
Espresso
Spice grinding
Cord storage
YES
Built-in safety features
YES
YES
General
Color
black
silver
Material
plastic
stainless steel
Warranty
1 Year
5 Years
Dimensions
Product Size
3.6 x 4.1 x 7.1 inches
6.7 x 6.3 x 14.2 inches
Product Weight
1.2 pounds
3.6 pounds
Common
Model
E167CYR
KM4 TT
Brand
Proctor Silex
Moccamaster
Rating on Amazon
3.9
3.7
Reviews on Amazon
2464
32
See price
See price
Electric coffee grinders comparison rating
better
worse
4.5
Proctor Silex E167CYR
0.5
Moccamaster KM4 TT
4.5
0.5
4.5
Proctor Silex E167CYR
0.5
Moccamaster KM4 TT
The best coffee grinder is Proctor Silex E167CYR.
Purchase Proctor Silex E167CYR at Amazon
Add coffee grinder to compare
Add to compare
We didn't find anything to show here
Latest coffee grinder comparisons
OXO Burr Coffee Grinder vs Baratza Encore vs Hario V60
vs
vs
Go to comparison
Hario V60 vs Moccamaster KM4 TT
vs
Go to comparison
OXO Burr Coffee Grinder vs Cuisinart DBM-8AMZ
vs
Go to comparison
Aicok Coffee Grinder vs Ninja XSKBGA
vs
Go to comparison
Cuisinart DCG-12BC vs KitchenAid BCG111OB
vs
Go to comparison
KitchenAid KCG0702CU vs Baratza Encore
vs
Go to comparison
Breville BCG600SIL vs KRUPS GVX212
vs
Go to comparison
BLACK+DECKER CBG100S vs Proctor Silex E167CYR
vs
Go to comparison
Hamilton Beach 80393 vs KRUPS F203
vs
Go to comparison
Hamilton Beach 80335 vs KRUPS F203
vs
Go to comparison
Share